Mark Clear who is running for the Assembly in Wisconsin held a fund raiser on Wednesday. I’ve known Mark through the start up community in Madison so when the Facebook invite showed up I figured I should head over to the “Beer with Clear” event to show my support.
Lately here in town I’ve been “that guy” when it comes to Bitcoin. Whether I’m getting a coffee, a haircut, or paying my office rent I’m always asking “Do you take Bitcoin”? I’m amazed how it’s usually met with curiosity and lots of questions. So of course when I arrived at the donation table I jokingly said “So are you guys accepting Bitcoin”? I wasn’t expecting the answer from the candidate, “We can! I’ve got a wallet on my phone.” I probably should have expected that Mark being a Tech guy would have a Bitcoin wallet.
I told Mark that I’d be happy to donate $100 worth of Bitcoin and we initiated the transfer. Within seconds the transfer for .2213 Bitcoins appeared on Mark’s phone evoking that empowered feeling that many Bitcoin users know so well. Realizing we may have just transacted the first Bitcoin campaign donation in Wisconsin we happily tweeted our interaction.
Well it only took 12 hours to find out no can do. It turns out that just about 6 weeks ago the Wisconsin GAB had taken up this very issue. See here
So it’s good to see the GAB is trying to deal with Bitcoin but much of what is in the minutes is either technically inaccurate or misapplied. Unfortunately this meeting also took place around the time of the Mt. Gox/ Transaction Malleability fiasco. There is much discussion in the report on Transaction Malleability and how it throws doubt on the process. This is technically incorrect. Although TM allows the ID of a transaction to change before it is placed in the block chain, once the ID is in the chain it is immutable.
From the GAB minutes:
“While core information in a transaction ID cannot be altered, additional information that would be critical to any committee (such as address and employer information) could be changed through transaction malleability.”
The problem here is that additional information is not stored within the Bitcoin system. Campaigns would just enter a bitcoin transaction ID in place of the information they use for a monetary donation (check, Visa etc). So even if TM was a problem (which it isn’t) it’s not relevant as donor information is stored separate from the transaction.
In fact using Bitcoin for transactions is actually more transparent than any other means of donation. Had we done this via check or credit card this transaction wouldn’t be a public record like it is with Bitcoin.
Here’s the transaction with me sending .2213 bitcoins to Mark
Less than 24 hours later Mark returned the .2213 coins to me here
The FEC is currently deciding on Bitcoin donations. I hope if nothing else they’ll treat them like cash and allow donations of up to $100. I searched the Wisconsin GAB site but couldn’t find the cash limit there. My understanding is it’s $50. In the meantime I’m forced to use PayPal, Credit card, or check to contribute to Mark’s campaign all of which cost me more in fees and time than our simple 15 second transaction the other night.
Here’s a link to the local story on the transaction http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/writers/jack_craver/madison-ald-mark-clear-accepts-bitcoin-contributions-in-his-run/article_c6a94862-d16a-11e3-ac97-001a4bcf887a.html